Commit 8d84c652c61eaab254b71e4145f0848a747a3abb

Authored by Geoffrey Challen
1 parent 80c38ae5

New.

Showing 2 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
paper.tex
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Apps} @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ Apps}
18 \else 18 \else
19 \fi 19 \fi
20 20
  21 +\toappear{}
  22 +
21 \begin{document} 23 \begin{document}
22 24
23 \ifdefined\isblue 25 \ifdefined\isblue
usage.tex
@@ -12,11 +12,9 @@ problem: what is the value of an app? @@ -12,11 +12,9 @@ problem: what is the value of an app?
12 All smartphone users intuitively realize that smartphone apps differ in 12 All smartphone users intuitively realize that smartphone apps differ in
13 value---an email client, for example, is probably more valuable than a app 13 value---an email client, for example, is probably more valuable than a app
14 that makes farting sounds. But is it possible to quantify these subjective 14 that makes farting sounds. But is it possible to quantify these subjective
15 -distinctions and produce a value measure?  
16 -  
17 -To argue that this is possible we present two experiments that elucidate  
18 -smartphone app value in the form of both ordinal and cardinal utilities,  
19 -respectively: 15 +distinctions and produce a value measure? To argue that this is possible we
  16 +present two experiments that elucidate smartphone app value in the form of
  17 +both ordinal and cardinal utilities:
20 % 18 %
21 \begin{enumerate} 19 \begin{enumerate}
22 20
@@ -72,12 +70,12 @@ videoconferencing app is not. Ultimately, all the energy consumption @@ -72,12 +70,12 @@ videoconferencing app is not. Ultimately, all the energy consumption
72 comparison truly reveals is that the two apps do different things---which we 70 comparison truly reveals is that the two apps do different things---which we
73 already knew. 71 already knew.
74 72
75 -Using energy consumption alone even makes apples-to-apples comparison of the same app  
76 -difficult. Given an app that consumes twice as much energy on Alice's  
77 -smartphone than on Bob's, the question of why is left unanswered by pure  
78 -energy measures. Even if usage time can be used to normalize the comparison  
79 -to the power consumed, power consumption alone cannot incorporate differences  
80 -due to the different app features or configurations used by Alice and Bob. 73 +Using energy consumption alone even makes apples-to-apples comparison of the
  74 +same app difficult. Given an app that consumes twice as much energy on
  75 +Alice's smartphone than on Bob's, the question of why is left unanswered by
  76 +pure energy measures. Even if usage time can be used to normalize the
  77 +comparison, power consumption alone cannot incorporate differences due to the
  78 +different app features or configurations used by Alice and Bob.
81 79
82 By computing value and, thus, energy efficiency, we can overcome these 80 By computing value and, thus, energy efficiency, we can overcome these
83 weaknesses. A value measure should allow us to compare the efficiency of two 81 weaknesses. A value measure should allow us to compare the efficiency of two