Commit c9307b5ec8f602ac384b9d1bb860d4ab57b5a0b5
1 parent
d46cc509
minor edits
Showing
1 changed file
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
usage.tex
| ... | ... | @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ video-conferencing app is not. Ultimately, all the energy consumption |
| 92 | 92 | comparison truly reveals is that the two apps do different things---which we |
| 93 | 93 | knew. |
| 94 | 94 | |
| 95 | -Using energy consumption alone even makes apples-to-apples of the same app | |
| 95 | +Using energy consumption alone even makes apples-to-apples comparison of the same app | |
| 96 | 96 | difficult. Given an app that consumes twice as much energy on Alice's |
| 97 | 97 | smartphone than on Bob's, the question of why is left unanswered by pure |
| 98 | 98 | energy measures. Even if usage time can be used to normalize the comparison |
| ... | ... | @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ over all users, differences in app energy efficiency should reflect how well |
| 110 | 110 | the app is written and how well it predicts and adapts to users, not just |
| 111 | 111 | differences in the core features it provides. And when comparing two users |
| 112 | 112 | using the same app, differences in energy efficiency should reflect different |
| 113 | -configurations or differences in how efficiently at app provides certain | |
| 113 | +configurations or differences in how efficiently the app provides certain | |
| 114 | 114 | features, not just that one user is using one feature and another is not. |
| 115 | 115 | |
| 116 | 116 | \subsection{Evaluating App Changes} | ... | ... |