From c9307b5ec8f602ac384b9d1bb860d4ab57b5a0b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: anudipa Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:50:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] minor edits --- usage.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/usage.tex b/usage.tex index 61b9880..12115f1 100644 --- a/usage.tex +++ b/usage.tex @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ video-conferencing app is not. Ultimately, all the energy consumption comparison truly reveals is that the two apps do different things---which we knew. -Using energy consumption alone even makes apples-to-apples of the same app +Using energy consumption alone even makes apples-to-apples comparison of the same app difficult. Given an app that consumes twice as much energy on Alice's smartphone than on Bob's, the question of why is left unanswered by pure energy measures. Even if usage time can be used to normalize the comparison @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ over all users, differences in app energy efficiency should reflect how well the app is written and how well it predicts and adapts to users, not just differences in the core features it provides. And when comparing two users using the same app, differences in energy efficiency should reflect different -configurations or differences in how efficiently at app provides certain +configurations or differences in how efficiently the app provides certain features, not just that one user is using one feature and another is not. \subsection{Evaluating App Changes} -- libgit2 0.22.2