|
|
1
|
\section{Related Works}
|
|
|
2
3
|
\label{sec:related}
|
|
|
4
|
OpenWireless movement~\cite{openwireless} is a community effort for ubiquitous
|
|
|
5
|
Internet access. Volunteers configure their
|
|
|
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
\wifi{} network with open access and a special SSID, \texttt{openwireless.org},
to advertise free access. Another goal of OpenWireless is arguably preserving
user's privacy by blending the user's network activity among all other users who
share access to the open \wifi{} network. On other hand, FON~\cite{fon} is a
commercial Wifi sharing network, where registered users can roam over
FON-supported Wifi networks. WLAN owners share their Wifi network either for
small money compensation, or to get Wifi access to other users when they are way
|
|
|
13
14
|
from home (roaming). FON aims at providing a global Wifi sharing community where
users want to connect to others' Wifi network because they are away from home and
|
|
|
15
|
have no WLAN access.
|
|
|
16
17
|
Both OpenWireless and FON aim at sharing \wifi{} access between strangers either
|
|
|
18
|
through volunteering or financial incentives. In contrast, in our proposal, users share
|
|
|
19
20
21
|
Wifi network locally (within neighbors) for better network performance, and the
sharing relationship is immediate (between two parties) and stable (physical
neighbor relationship).
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
There are also several works on cooperative \wifi{} sharing. Dimopoulos
|
|
|
24
|
\textit{et al.}~\cite{efstathiou2010controlled} propose a reciprocal Wifi
|
|
|
25
|
sharing mechanism and later extend it to a large scale peer-to-peer Wifi
|
|
|
26
|
roaming framework~\cite{dimopoulos2010exploiting}. They mostly focus on the
|
|
|
27
28
|
reciprocal manner of sharing: each user who shares his/her WLAN will obtain
digital proof of service (\textit{receipts}), which represents a ``I-owe-you''
|
|
|
29
30
|
relationship. These receipts can later on be consumed to get reciprocal Wifi
access from other users. Such reputation mechanisms can also be applied to
|
|
|
31
32
|
\wisefi{}, although they can be simplified since the sharing is between two
immediate peers with physical colocation relationship.
|