diff --git a/inefficiency.tex b/inefficiency.tex
index dd2c17a..733055b 100644
--- a/inefficiency.tex
+++ b/inefficiency.tex
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ to use inefficiency as a constraint to their
 system~\cite{david2011memory,deng2012multiscale,deng2011memscale,diniz2007limiting,lebeck2000power,malladi2012towards,sudan2010micro,zheng2009decoupled}.
 %
 While most of the existing multi-component energy management approaches work
-under performance constraints, some have potential to be modified to work
+under performance constraints, some have the potential to be modified to work
 under energy constraints and thus could operate under 
 inefficiency budget~\cite{bitirgen2008coordinated,deng2012coscale,chen2011coordinating,fan2005synergy,felter2005performance,li2007cross,raghavendra2008no}.
 %
diff --git a/performance_clusters.tex b/performance_clusters.tex
index 0f65861..04a8a90 100644
--- a/performance_clusters.tex
+++ b/performance_clusters.tex
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ number of transitions made by \textit{lbm} decreases with an increase in cluster
 threshold, however, the absolute number of transitions compared to other
 benchmarks does not decrease significantly as it doesn't have too many
 transition to start with at 3\%.  Like our previous observation, the number of
-transitions also decreases with increase in inefficiency for these two
-benchmarks showing that there is a high number of consecutive samples that have
-similar performance but different inefficiency at same CPU and memory frequency
+transitions also decreases with increasing inefficiency for these two
+benchmarks. This shows that there is a high number of consecutive samples that have
+similar performance but different inefficiency at the same CPU and memory frequency
 settings. A decrease in the number of transitions is a result of an increase in
 the length of stable regions.